【Watch A Taste of Experience Online】
Despite what a lot people believe,Watch A Taste of Experience Online WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said he didn't intend to influence the U.S. election when he leaked troves of private emails.
Assange has been publishing copies of thousands of emails from Hillary Clinton's camp during the final months of the election campaign, but claims he did it all for the good of the public.
SEE ALSO: How did the FBI search through all those new Clinton emails so fast?"This is not due to a personal desire to influence the outcome of the election," Assange, who is hiding out in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, said in a statement. He said the organization publishes any information it receives that is in the public interest and that if he had information on Clinton's rival, Donald Trump, it would also be published.
You May Also Like
"We publish material given to us if it is of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical importance and which has not been published elsewhere. When we have material that fulfills this criteria, we publish," Assange wrote in the 1,000-word statement.
"At the same time, we cannot publish what we do not have. To date, we have not received information on Donald Trump’s campaign, or Jill Stein’s campaign, or Gary Johnson’s campaign or any of the other candidates that fufills our stated editorial criteria."

The extensive leak, which journalists have been rummaging through for juicy details, mainly exposed insider conversations. Some of the unusual things we have discovered: Tim Cook was suggested as Clinton's vice president and that John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chief, may have been hacked.
Following the leaks, U.S. intelligence claimed WikiLeaks was acting as a delivery vehicle for Russia, who it believes stole some of the emails.
In the statement, Assange said the Clinton campaign was spreading misinformation about Moscow's involvement and denied WikiLeaks had any connection with Russia.
"The Clinton campaign, when they were not spreading obvious untruths, pointed to unnamed sources or to speculative and vague statements from the intelligence community to suggest a nefarious allegiance with Russia," Assange wrote. "The campaign was unable to invoke evidence about our publications—because none exists."
-- Additional reporting by Associated Press.
Topics Elections
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Parental Controls: How to Lock Down Your Kids' iOS Devices
2025-06-26 13:51Best grocery deal: Spend $20 and get $5 off at Amazon
2025-06-26 11:08Popular Posts
Catch up on Twitter's top tweets from the past week
2025-06-26 13:02Orlando shooter posted to Facebook multiple times during massacre
2025-06-26 11:51Dyson V8 Plus cordless vacuum: $120 off at Amazon
2025-06-26 11:13Featured Posts
Today's Hurdle hints and answers for May 12, 2025
2025-06-26 13:03MoviePass is dying and the memes are brutal
2025-06-26 12:243D printed guns: an explainer
2025-06-26 11:59Gods of War
2025-06-26 11:27Popular Articles
Our first look at the DJI Mavic 2 is here
2025-06-26 13:02Mac Mini M2 Desktop deal: Save $100 at Best Buy
2025-06-26 11:36Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (297)
Prosperous Times Information Network
Best IPL deal: Save $80 on Braun IPL Silk·Expert
2025-06-26 12:58Treasure Information Network
Huawei overtakes Apple to become the second largest smartphone vendor
2025-06-26 12:57Free Roaming Information Network
Kit Harington punched 'Game of Thrones' actor IRL while filming
2025-06-26 12:48Wisdom Convergence Information Network
Solar flares severed radio communication during 2017 hurricane season
2025-06-26 12:38Imprint Information Network
Best Max streaming deal: Save 20% on annual subscriptions
2025-06-26 12:36