【Sexy Sisters】
Hey,Sexy Sisters Instagram haters: Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but the company has no plans to change its algorithm-based photo feed, despite what you may have heard.
Rumors began swirling late last week that the photo-sharing app had miraculously decided to reverse the two-year-old decision to implement an algorithmic feed. Naturally, bloggers and Instagram influencers promptly lost their collective shit.
SEE ALSO: Meet Vero: Why a billionaire's Instagram alternative is suddenly so popularUnfortunately for them, though, the "rumor" is just another example of how quickly social platforms can amplify misinformation. Instagram has outright denied it.
The rumor began when photographer Jack Harding, claiming to be an Instagram employee, posted on his Story last Friday that Instagram was moving "back to chronological order." He purportedly posted a video showing eight posts from his feed in chronological order. Harding has 169,000 followers and the rumor quickly took off from there.
Instagram is adamant that is has no such plans. An Instagram spokesperson confirmed this, calling the rumor "totally untrue." The spokesperson also confirmed that Harding is not employed by the company.
When reached for comment, Harding said his comments about working at Instagram were a "joke" and that he "later clarified for my followers who may not have originally understood this joke." But, as we've seen so many times before, it appears as if Harding's "clarification" didn't spread nearly as widely as his original post.
It's also worth pointing out that Instagram's current algorithm does take recency into account. So it's entirely possible to open your feed and see a handful of posts that are in chronological order. It doesn't mean Instagram is testing anything new or that the feed has changed in a fundamental way.
Harding declined to share his original post with me (though you can see snippets of it on other blogs) so it's impossible to say for sure if this is the explanation for what he claims to have seen. (A less kind explanation would be that he made the whole thing up entirely.)
Regardless, the incident should serve as yet another reminder that we shouldn't be so quick to believe everything we read on social media.
Featured Video For You
Topics Instagram Social Media
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Singles don't want to date non
2025-06-26 04:40Ryzen 5 1600X vs. 1600: Which should you buy?
2025-06-26 03:35Popular Posts
Contingent No More
2025-06-26 04:39Why California lawmaker Buffy Wicks voted with her crying baby
2025-06-26 03:49Let's all start preparing emotionally for President Kid Rock
2025-06-26 03:36Best soundbar deal: Save $300 on the Sonos Arc
2025-06-26 03:23Featured Posts
Google Pixel Buds Pro 2: $40 off at Amazon
2025-06-26 05:16Why California lawmaker Buffy Wicks voted with her crying baby
2025-06-26 05:11Uber to require mask selfies for riders who haven’t been covering up
2025-06-26 04:01Dyson V8 Plus cordless vacuum: $120 off at Amazon
2025-06-26 03:48Popular Articles
Triller makes play to buy U.S. TikTok, report claims
2025-06-26 04:19How to Easily Make iPhone Ringtones Using Only iTunes
2025-06-26 03:47Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (8979)
Fashion Information Network
5 Ways to Access a Locked Windows Account
2025-06-26 04:57Star Sky Information Network
The internet had a field day with Trump's defense of his 'high quality' son
2025-06-26 04:49Fresh Information Network
This sick skateboarding kitten is cooler than you
2025-06-26 04:29Unique Information Network
Let's all start preparing emotionally for President Kid Rock
2025-06-26 03:13Impression Information Network
How to Squeeze the Most Out of Your iPhone's Battery
2025-06-26 03:11